EU Referendum


Booker: "dry homes" before "wet lands"


09/03/2014



000a Booker-008 Greens2.jpg

Picking up on the "20-year plan" for the Somerset Levels, Booker devotes his lead story to Owen Paterson's attempts to avert future disasters - despite EU directives and intervention by "eco" campaigners.

It's over nine weeks since we first became aware of those abnormal floods in Somerset and then the Thames, although it seems much longer. And during that period, two quite different dramas have been unfolding.

At the centre of one of these dramas has been the drive to uncover just why these disasters took place, and what should be done to prevent them happening again. The other, round the edges, has been a concerted campaign to fog the real issues, and to divert attention from what made the disasters inevitable.

The shocking truth, that we have been reporting, Booker in his column, and here on this blog, is that those unprecedented floods were not just a freak of nature, brought on by what turned out to be only England’s 16th wettest winter in 250 years.

They were deliberately brought about by a fundamental shift in flood management policy, shaped by EU directives and enforced by the Environment Agency, which in certain areas of the country, notably the Levels, put the interests of wildlife and "biodiversity" above those of people and property.

Fortunately, one of the who has grasped this is Environment Secretary Owen Paterson. After private meetings with local experts, arranged By Booker, he returned to London with a clear idea of what needed to be done.

Crucially, Paterson experts are calling for the management of the Levels to be handed over to a locally-based "Somerset rivers authority", taking over from the Environment Agency, and the Internal Drainage Boards, which previously kept the Levels pumped and drained for generations.

There should be a new sluice at the mouth of the River Parrett, to prevent silt being pushed back into it by the second highest tidal range in the world. And within six weeks the relevant local organisations should present him with an agreed plan to ensure that this winter's disaster is not repeated.

But, so sooner had these plans been published, a rival lobby has been desperately trying to divert attention from them. "Environmentalists" have been battling to preserve their dream by hiding everything which made disaster inevitable.

Their "useful idiots", such as the BBC and the journalist George Monbiot, have repeatedly tried to blame the disaster on "climate change", and on greedy farmers increasing the run-off of water from the hills by planting maize: two theories which no proper scientific evidence supports.

On Friday they were at it again, with two items on the BBC Radio 4 Today programme featuring Monbiot and the BBC's Roger Harrabin.

However, even before Paterson's announcement, Booker's local BBC staged an hour-long "all heat and no light" show, pitting a studio-full of flood victims against singularly unimpressive representatives of the Environment Agency and the RSPB – along with a barely articulate policewoman who was apparently "Gold Commander", in charge of co-ordinating that response to the local floods which the admirable residents found so pitifully inadequate.

Then as has been the case with so much of our media, there was no mention from the presenter, of course, of the EU’s directives on birds, habitat, water and flood management.

On Thursday Radio 4's World at One wheeled on some dim professor to rubbish the Paterson plan, who inevitably babbled about "climate change" and the "ineffectiveness" of dredging.

The only important point to emerge from this vapid cacophony is that Paterson, as a practical countryman and nature lover himself, has come up with precisely that change of policy needed to avert a another disaster which gets the champions of "biodiversity" so apoplectic.

The final irony, of course, is that, even more than the human residents of the Levels, the most obvious victims of this disaster have been all those barn owls, badgers, hedgehogs and water voles which were drowned, in the very floodwaters which the EU directives lobbied for by the "environmentalists" made inevitable.

By far the best way to maximise biodiversity on the levels is to ensure that they are not flooded.