logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

richard
#1 Posted : 28 October 2012 15:51:49(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 3,021
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 96 times
Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
n this sixth and final (for the time being) part of the series, one recalls it started with a piece in the Daily Mail, upon which I remarked in the context of Cameron's Oxford tutor, Vernon Bogdanor, asserting that the Second World War was a "People's War", because of the paternalistic "humanity" of our war leaders - Field Marshall Montgomery amongst them.

The reason why this error is so important, as I have averred, is that it represents the establishment habit of re-writing history, a long line of distortions and myths which serve only to reinforce the supposed moral supremacy of our "ruling classes", in an attempt to legitimise their claims to hold power over us.

This is very much Harrogate Agenda stuff, because the one unalterable thing about our nation is that there are more of us "plebs" than there are rulers, and they only way they can exert power is by "consent", which relies in turn on establishment myths which stake out their rights to usurp our power.

View full article here
 1 user thanked richard for this useful post.
catcherinthesham on 28/10/2012(UTC)
William Gruff
#2 Posted : 28 October 2012 16:14:01(UTC)
William Gruff

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 90
United Kingdom
Location: Lytham St Annes

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 14 time(s) in 11 post(s)
I think there is a very strong possibility that the 'moral supremacy' of establishment types is soon going to be seen for the sham it is.
richard
#3 Posted : 28 October 2012 17:00:09(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 3,021
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 96 times
Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
Originally Posted by: William Gruff Go to Quoted Post
I think there is a very strong possibility that the 'moral supremacy' of establishment types is soon going to be seen for the sham it is.




That's why it is in inverted commas. But it is a vital part of their self-image that they should feel superior to us "plebs", which is why, of course, they need to re-write history. The idea that the plebs have the ultimate power, and that they rely on our willing compliance for their status and ability to rule us, is not one with which they are terribly comfortable.

thespecialone
#4 Posted : 28 October 2012 18:00:15(UTC)
thespecialone

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 203
Man
United Kingdom
Location: Gloucestershire

Thanks: 6 times
Was thanked: 8 time(s) in 7 post(s)
Not much has changed has it regarding the "ruling classes" collusion with the media in telling us what they want us to know. Look at how the media report "global warming" and follow hook line and sinker that it is our fault that everybody will fry to death in the coming decades. It is on other subjects too. Take EDL/UAF marches/countermarches. EDL are always called "far-right" whereas UAF are never referred to as "far-left". A few years ago the media reported that the EDL caused riots around London. However, on youtube there was a clip that clearly showed that UAF were the instigators of any trouble. But as Cameron has signed up as a supporter of UAF (he is so thick that he clearly doesn't realise that Unite Against Facism wants to prevent free speech), you can bet that you will not hear Cameron speaking out against UAF violence.

PS. I am not a supporter of EDL but believe they have the right to march.
john in cheshire
#5 Posted : 28 October 2012 20:04:40(UTC)
john in cheshire

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 61
United Kingdom
Location: cheshire

Thanks: 83 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 2 post(s)
If this is happening here, Richard, then it's most certainly happening in all other countries. One wonders what the real history of the World actually is. I'm not suggesting that you expand your researches, but it would be good if people in other countries emulated your efforts; then perhaps we'd get proper history. And as an afterthought, how long must we wait until history reflects what happened; i.e. is the history of the English Civil War accurate? Or 1066?
permex
#6 Posted : 28 October 2012 21:50:56(UTC)
permex

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 116
Portugal
Location: North

Was thanked: 12 time(s) in 10 post(s)
The PTB inhabit every party....and the wannabe PTB is the same, waiting for their chance at the control-panel & its associated trough.
The biggest disadvantage for any PTB member, current or would-be, is to speak what used to be the King's English which sets one up as a toff & thus an enemy no matter what the merit.
Hence the dumbing down, as in all other spheres, of the language. So powerful is this yen for the glottal stop & an Estuary accent that even younger Royalty, the epitome of the Establishment is affected...and affected is the right word. Lord knows what Granny thinks about that...innit.
richard
#7 Posted : 28 October 2012 21:57:15(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 3,021
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 96 times
Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
Originally Posted by: thespecialone Go to Quoted Post
Not much has changed has it regarding the "ruling classes" collusion with the media in telling us what they want us to know. Look at how the media report "global warming" and follow hook line and sinker that it is our fault that everybody will fry to death in the coming decades. It is on other subjects too. Take EDL/UAF marches/countermarches. EDL are always called "far-right" whereas UAF are never referred to as "far-left". A few years ago the media reported that the EDL caused riots around London. However, on youtube there was a clip that clearly showed that UAF were the instigators of any trouble. But as Cameron has signed up as a supporter of UAF (he is so thick that he clearly doesn't realise that Unite Against Facism wants to prevent free speech), you can bet that you will not hear Cameron speaking out against UAF violence.

PS. I am not a supporter of EDL but believe they have the right to march.





I've been reading up the Battle of Cable Street ... the British Union of Fascists holding a march, supported by the Police, beating up the the local Communists. Nothing much changes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/...i/Battle_of_Cable_Street




.

Edited by user 28 October 2012 22:01:15(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

citroenchris
#8 Posted : 28 October 2012 22:34:09(UTC)
citroenchris

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 09/10/2012(UTC)
Posts: 20
Location: orillia, ontario

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Im not sure that relying on the communist press is any more accurate than the modern media, I still dont think there was the outrage reported, my paternal grandfather was from the Elephant and castle and my maternal was from NW10 near the Rootes factory and gasworks and neither wanted to shelter in the underground "like rats" I doubt it was realistic to provide workable deep shelters for all, in war you have to protect what is most important first and the government and factories need to be protected first. Were the well known tunnels in Liverpool put to shelter use? ive not read so, we need to look at the whole urban population not just one, left wing section of the capitol! From what I had heard the greatest asset after the English channel was Churchill, hence the various plots the Nazis made to kidnap or kill him.
As for the communists wanting to sue for peace with Hitler that is a crock, it suited the communists 100% to have the UK fighting their only threat in the world! The yanks were in Stalins pocket, indeed Churchill had looked at invading the USSR to drive it out of Europe. The blight of communism is the real threat and has been for a century, I suspect the unseen hand behind the EU is theirs.
richard
#9 Posted : 28 October 2012 22:59:48(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 3,021
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 96 times
Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
Originally Posted by: citroenchris Go to Quoted Post
Im not sure that relying on the communist press is any more accurate than the modern media, I still dont think there was the outrage reported, my paternal grandfather was from the Elephant and castle and my maternal was from NW10 near the Rootes factory and gasworks and neither wanted to shelter in the underground "like rats" I doubt it was realistic to provide workable deep shelters for all, in war you have to protect what is most important first and the government and factories need to be protected first. Were the well known tunnels in Liverpool put to shelter use? ive not read so, we need to look at the whole urban population not just one, left wing section of the capitol! From what I had heard the greatest asset after the English channel was Churchill, hence the various plots the Nazis made to kidnap or kill him.
As for the communists wanting to sue for peace with Hitler that is a crock, it suited the communists 100% to have the UK fighting their only threat in the world! The yanks were in Stalins pocket, indeed Churchill had looked at invading the USSR to drive it out of Europe. The blight of communism is the real threat and has been for a century, I suspect the unseen hand behind the EU is theirs.




These is no question that the Communists were playing a very dubious game ... but they were entirely open in seeking to use the shelter issue as a means of bringing down the government. But as to the "outrage" about the lack of shelter, the interesting thing is that attitudes varied widely ... this is what I've been writing in my analysis ...


Quote:
Adding to the overnight damage in London, daylight raids continued, hitting widely dispersed targets, which included south London suburbs such as Weybridge, Kingston and Croydon. As bombers met fighters, they jettisoned their bombs. Considerable damage was done to suburban homes. Kingston and Surbiton suffered heavily. Then Southampton and Rochester were targeted again. Through the day, though, the East End was toured by the Prime Minister and the King and Queen, in an attempt to raise morale. At one point, the royal couple was booed by the crowd.

Ted Bramley, the London Communist leader was later to expand on this. “The reaction of the people is very significant”, he said. “It varies and is a little different area by area, according to the experience through which people have gone. In East and South-East London particularly, there is no other topic of conversation. All energy and thought is first devoted to getting a bit of food, a bit of sleep, and shelter. But at the same time, there is widespread expression of bitter dissatisfaction. Universally they demand better and safer shelters. There are more bitter expressions of class hatred against the rich than I have heard for years”.



Ravenscar
#10 Posted : 29 October 2012 01:12:25(UTC)
Ravenscar

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 915
Location: The North

Thanks: 111 times
Was thanked: 123 time(s) in 86 post(s)
Quote:
Those are the lessons for us today. It is said that history is written by the victors – but that is too simplistic. History is written by our rulers, to create establishment myths which are designed to keep us "plebs" in our places. Thus, when the plebs win a famous victory, history has to be re-written in the Bognador style, to remove any traces of it ever having happened.

To the masses, therefore, the great call should not be to "arise and cast off your chains", but "arise and cast off your history". Our histories have become our chains.


This is perhaps nothing new - the Tudors did a good number on the last Plantagenet King, Richard III.

The Romans were fond of rewriting history, as it were.

Alas, I think, that there is a difference, post WWII the authorities - isn't the word they use today.......er redacted the bits of the thread that they knew damn well should not be acclaimed or remembered - to me that is censorship.

For forty years, the press have not been able to discuss la situation actuelle concerning the EU - same difference Richard.

Censorship.
Derek
#11 Posted : 29 October 2012 13:33:43(UTC)
Derek

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 22/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 32
United Kingdom
Location: New Forest

Thanks: 1 times
You have highlighted a dark corner of our history. No doubt there are many other such issues that have been almost "airbrushed". The "inconvenient truth" that civil dosobedience on a mass scale cannot be stopped is something our masters would like to forget, though examples exist all over the world - hence the many revolutions. One example in our recent past is the poll tax which became unworkable in certain areas. What was interesting was that no such disobedience occurred with the smoking ban. I think this was because there were sufficient numbers supporting it. There is a campaign to stop paying TV licenses which I understand has achieved some success, though I am not sure how widespread it is. Generally in this country the people have been very obedient.
richard
#12 Posted : 29 October 2012 13:45:46(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 3,021
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 96 times
Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Derek Go to Quoted Post
You have highlighted a dark corner of our history. No doubt there are many other such issues that have been almost "airbrushed". The "inconvenient truth" that civil disobedience on a mass scale cannot be stopped is something our masters would like to forget, though examples exist all over the world - hence the many revolutions. One example in our recent past is the poll tax which became unworkable in certain areas. What was interesting was that no such disobedience occurred with the smoking ban. I think this was because there were sufficient numbers supporting it. There is a campaign to stop paying TV licenses which I understand has achieved some success, though I am not sure how widespread it is. Generally in this country the people have been very obedient.



I think the difference is that activities such as smoking and paying bills (BBC tax) are individual things, with no organised political constituency. The Poll Tax riots, however, were politically motivated and organised ... as indeed was the shelter campaign. There is some merit here in asking whether single issue groups actually work, or whether you need an overarching political grouping to achieve anything. We perhaps need an portmanteau "anti-government" movement, which can then adopt individual issues as they arise.

Edited by user 29 October 2012 13:46:47(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

richard
#13 Posted : 29 October 2012 13:51:06(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 3,021
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 96 times
Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Ravenscar Go to Quoted Post
Quote:
Those are the lessons for us today. It is said that history is written by the victors – but that is too simplistic. History is written by our rulers, to create establishment myths which are designed to keep us "plebs" in our places. Thus, when the plebs win a famous victory, history has to be re-written in the Bognador style, to remove any traces of it ever having happened.

To the masses, therefore, the great call should not be to "arise and cast off your chains", but "arise and cast off your history". Our histories have become our chains.


This is perhaps nothing new - the Tudors did a good number on the last Plantagenet King, Richard III.

The Romans were fond of rewriting history, as it were.

Alas, I think, that there is a difference, post WWII the authorities - isn't the word they use today.......er redacted the bits of the thread that they knew damn well should not be acclaimed or remembered - to me that is censorship.

For forty years, the press have not been able to discuss la situation actuelle concerning the EU - same difference Richard.

Censorship.



So much of this is self-censorship. The media is, primarily, a supporter of the status quo. It will make trouble around the margins, but it won't have anything to do with movements which pose a fundamental challenge to the system.

Brian
#14 Posted : 29 October 2012 14:51:18(UTC)
Brian

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 20/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 115
United Kingdom
Location: Coventry

Thanks: 12 times
Was thanked: 7 time(s) in 6 post(s)
People Power even worked in Berlin in 1943 - the Rosenstrasse Protest.
Nothing is impossible so long as everybody does exactly what I tell them.
richard
#15 Posted : 29 October 2012 14:59:24(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 3,021
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 96 times
Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Brian Go to Quoted Post
People Power even worked in Berlin in 1943 - the Rosenstrasse Protest.



What an absolutely superb example. Thank you. It so much confirms the Hern precept.

Dodgy Geezer
#16 Posted : 29 October 2012 15:14:40(UTC)
Dodgy Geezer

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/07/2012(UTC)
Posts: 320
United Kingdom

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 39 time(s) in 25 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Ravenscar Go to Quoted Post
Quote:
Those are the lessons for us today. It is said that history is written by the victors – but that is too simplistic. History is written by our rulers, to create establishment myths which are designed to keep us "plebs" in our places. Thus, when the plebs win a famous victory, history has to be re-written in the Bognador style, to remove any traces of it ever having happened.

To the masses, therefore, the great call should not be to "arise and cast off your chains", but "arise and cast off your history". Our histories have become our chains.


This is perhaps nothing new - the Tudors did a good number on the last Plantagenet King, Richard III.

The Romans were fond of rewriting history, as it were.

Alas, I think, that there is a difference, post WWII the authorities - isn't the word they use today.......er redacted the bits of the thread that they knew damn well should not be acclaimed or remembered - to me that is censorship.

For forty years, the press have not been able to discuss la situation actuelle concerning the EU - same difference Richard.

Censorship.



Indeed. I don't know why it is presented as surprising. Always has happened - always will. Here is a very good example on youtube - a massacre of Americans in Vietnam turned into a victory by the spin doctors. Skip the early part describing the ambush if you want - the most telling political comment is at the end. And it's exactly the same message as Dr North presents here...

Battle of Ong Thahn
richard
#17 Posted : 29 October 2012 20:49:55(UTC)
Richard

Rank: Administration

Groups: Registered, Administrators
Joined: 16/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 3,021
United Kingdom
Location: Bradford

Thanks: 96 times
Was thanked: 306 time(s) in 255 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Dodgy Geezer Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: Ravenscar Go to Quoted Post
Quote:
Those are the lessons for us today. It is said that history is written by the victors – but that is too simplistic. History is written by our rulers, to create establishment myths which are designed to keep us "plebs" in our places. Thus, when the plebs win a famous victory, history has to be re-written in the Bognador style, to remove any traces of it ever having happened.

To the masses, therefore, the great call should not be to "arise and cast off your chains", but "arise and cast off your history". Our histories have become our chains.


This is perhaps nothing new - the Tudors did a good number on the last Plantagenet King, Richard III.

The Romans were fond of rewriting history, as it were.

Alas, I think, that there is a difference, post WWII the authorities - isn't the word they use today.......er redacted the bits of the thread that they knew damn well should not be acclaimed or remembered - to me that is censorship.

For forty years, the press have not been able to discuss la situation actuelle concerning the EU - same difference Richard.

Censorship.



Indeed. I don't know why it is presented as surprising. Always has happened - always will. Here is a very good example on youtube - a massacre of Americans in Vietnam turned into a victory by the spin doctors. Skip the early part describing the ambush if you want - the most telling political comment is at the end. And it's exactly the same message as Dr North presents here...

Battle of Ong Thahn




"I started to become a cynic ...". Heh! We all have our learning curves.

Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF 1.9.6.1 | YAF © 2003-2013, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.303 seconds.